<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Full Websites VS Landing Pages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nickthrolson.com/full-websites-vs-landing-pages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nickthrolson.com/full-websites-vs-landing-pages/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneur and Successful Affiliate Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forest</title>
		<link>http://www.nickthrolson.com/full-websites-vs-landing-pages/#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator>Forest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickthrolson.com/?p=844#comment-462</guid>
		<description>I agree Nick, long term is best and full sites will ultimately perform better.

Like your affiliate compare site... in the long run you will benefit from the effort you put into this as a full site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Nick, long term is best and full sites will ultimately perform better.</p>
<p>Like your affiliate compare site&#8230; in the long run you will benefit from the effort you put into this as a full site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

